I'm an ECD caller and I'm very familiar with gender-free calling in the genre.
The left-file right-file thing comes from the "Heather and Rose" group in
Oregon, which does gender-free English and Scottish. Their foremost exponent is Brooke
Friendly, who wrote the CDSS book "Dancing the Whole Dance; she turned me on to this
style of calling 25 years ago. [Incidentally, their official definition of "left
file and right file" is that as you stand facing your partner, if your left shoulder
is pointing up you're in the left file, if the right shoulder is pointing up
you're in the right file. Anyway, if you the caller are at the top of the set looking
at the dancers, the left file is on your right, right file is on your left.
(If you have a choreography where the two larks would do something or the two robins would
do something, those people are (or start out) diagonally across from each other, so you
can refer to first diagonals (robin position) or second diagonals (lark position) and also
identify the four larks or four robins in a square by first and second diagonals.)
Most of the time even the proponents of this system will just use room landmarks [which
can be well-chosen or ill-chosen; using landmarks on the stage (eg, "piano
side") when the room is a lot wider than the stage isn't particularly helpful to
those people. "Clock side", "Window Side", etc.
[Although discussing this with some Brits I learned that the obvious-to-me "Clock
side is the same side as the clock" isn't universal; they thought clock side was
the side *facing the clock*, which makes some sense in that the way we do it means you
have to identify with the landmark you can't see.]
At a small folk festival once, where I had one longish longways set that mostly did the
same thing but one of them needed to do a thing first, I identified the lines as (stand at
the head of the set waving for attention) "This line" and (pointing)
"That line". WOrked fine.
Where left file and right file are really useful is in writing down dances so you can
follow the thread through for one person without landmarks- #1L retains the number and
role through the dance sequence.
This style doesn't use lark and robin role names (or any, really) but it seems like
some East Coast callers have chosen to do that, just as a drop-in replacement for
"gents" and "ladies". Easier on the caller - you really have to
rethink your dance instructions in doing it in the more positional way, but a lot of
English dancers don't like it.
-- Alan
-- Alan
________________________________________
From: Julian Blechner via Contra Callers <contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2025 5:53 AM
Cc: contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
Subject: [Callers] Re: Gents/Larks and Ladies/Robins lines
BEWARE: This email originated outside of our organization. DO NOT CLICK links or
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
I believe some ECD dance callers use "left file" and "right file".
Even before Larks/Robins, contra dances I've been to where a dance needed to indicate
the lines often just picked landmarks for the walkthrough, and then prompted the move
without them, like "windows side arch, door side dive through" for teaching, and
"arch and dive" during prompting.
In dance,
Julian Blechner
he/him
Western Mass, USA
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 6:55 AM Rich Goss via Contra Callers
<contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net<mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net>>
wrote:
I recently attended a ceilidgh in London. The caller called Flying Scotsman which is a
longways set. They arranged it by the taller on the left and designated them 2s. The
shorter line 1s. Thought it was a clever way to set it up. They would call something
like “2s line arch, 1s line lead through”. This may be common in th UK, but it was new
to me (a travelling US person)
As far as to say whether certain roll terms should or shouldn’t be used, well…I’m not
wading into that.
Rich
On Oct 13, 2025, at 9:35 PM, Michael Fuerst via Contra
Callers
<contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net<mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net>>
wrote:
Before the rise to prominence of larks and robins, callers and dance transcriptions would
occasionally refer to the gents'/ladies' line as the line in which gets/ladies
would line up for a proper dance.
Should this now rarely used designation be declared obsolete or deprecated, or should we
now occasionally refer to the gents' and ladies' lines
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list --
contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net<mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net>
To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave@lists.sharedweight.net<mailto:contracallers-leave@lists.sharedweight.net>
_______________________________________________
Contra Callers mailing list --
contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net<mailto:contracallers@lists.sharedweight.net>
To unsubscribe send an email to
contracallers-leave@lists.sharedweight.net<mailto:contracallers-leave@lists.sharedweight.net>