On Sat, Aug 9, 2025 at 12:52 PM Bob Hofkin via Contra Callers
<contracallers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
I pulled Contra*Butions 3 off my shelf, and found the term "balanced
square thru" (along with a definition). I'm sure Chris and Michael have
good reason for standardizing on "interrupted" and I'm not about to
challenge them.
Bob
Thank you for the vote of confidence, but sometimes these things
"just happen". I picked up interrupted square through from Bob
Isaacs, who used to notate his dances with two balances and four square
throughs within the same minor set as
A1: 4,4 Balance, interrupted square through four
4,4 Balance, interrupted square through four
In his more recent dance transcriptions, he no longer uses the word
"interrupted."
I picked it up anyway, and used that as a standard, which then
wound up getting used when my database got ported over to
Caller's Box years later.
The notation used to be
(4) Partner balance (RH)
(4) Interrupted square through 2 (PR;NL)
(4) Partner balance (RH)
(4) Interrupted square through 2 (PR;NL)
It bothered me enough to tweak things about a year or two ago.
(16) Interrupted square through 4:
(4) Partner balance (RH)
(4) Square through 2 (PR;NL)
(4) Partner balance (RH)
(4) Square through 2 (PR;NL)
At least this is clearer because there's no longer a figure
called "interrupted square through" that is in some way
different from "square through", and it serves as a
searchable term. The downside is some callers will
see it and inflict the additional word "interrupted" on dancers.
Having danced on the coasts, I hadn't heard the phrase
"balanced square through" enough. Thoughts on switching
out "interrupted square through" with "balanced square through"?
It still preserves the block structure, so it's clear it's one large figure.
And it's still a searchable term, so people can check for that
category of thing.
Cheers,
-Chris Page
Los Angeles, CA