Re: [Callers] As in Petronella - Import1

17 Dec 2015

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, Neal Schlein wrote:
...
  On Dec 17, 2015 8:50 AM, "Aahz Maruch via
Callers" <
 callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net&gt; wrote:
  On Thu, Dec 17, 2015, John Sweeney via Callers
wrote:

 Whether complete standardisation is a good thing or a bad thing is another
 matter entirely; we all have our own opinions about MWSD :-) 
 Note that MWSD is not completely standardized -- it's more like the C
 programming language with areas that are ill-defined, or at least which
 only extremely nitpicky people know how to do correctly.   
 Umm...Aahz, I think you missed the point about standardization in contra
 versus MWSD. 
Maybe, but I was responding specifically to the whole phrase "complete
standardisation".  I can rant on and on about the falsity of "dancing by
definition".  ;-)  Obviously square dancing is more standardized than
contra.
-- 
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6                        http://rule6.info/
                      <*>           <*>           <*>
"In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon.
Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsoft Windows 98.
Something must have gone wrong."  --/bin/fortune