On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 21:57:30 -0700, Martha Wild via Callers wrote:
> What is it with people and every dance having to have a neighbor swing? I
personally dislike dance programs where
> every dance has a neighbor swing. Sometimes Id like to pay attention to
the partner Im dancing with and not
> everyone else. Sometimes interesting choreography is available when you
dont have to squeeze two swings into
> everything.
That's exactly what I think, and I'm so pleased to hear an American say the
same thing!
Colin Hume (currently in Ann Arbor, MI where I'm calling a workshop of
Advanced Contras & Squares on Saturday)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com ? Enhanced email for the mobile individual based on Microsoft?
Exchange - https://link.mail2web.com/Personal/EnhancedEmail
I completely agree with the others who have responded. The world needs more
dances with fewer swings. I love swinging but I love other moves as well.
If a dance has something like "Partner Balance & Swing, Circle Left 3/4,
Neighbour Swing" then my immediate reaction is that that is half the dance
gone already and it has nothing interesting in it. We've all done that a
thousand times. Let's have some variety!
Once you break out of the need for two swings in a dance you can use the
space to create much more interesting choreography.
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
I agree with Martha and Colin. There's no reason to think that any contra
dance without two swings has a bug, necessarily, although Don may have been
in the mindset of fulfilling the desires and catering to the tastes of his
audiences when he said what he said. I can support that, too!
Greg
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 3:01 PM, via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> wrote:
> Send Callers mailing list submissions to
> callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
> http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> callers-request(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> callers-owner(a)lists.sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Another Existential Inquiry (Don Veino via Callers)
> 2. Re: Another Existential Inquiry (Martha Wild via Callers)
> 3. Re: Another Existential Inquiry (colin(a)colinhume.com via Callers)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 21:39:33 -0400
> From: Don Veino via Callers <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Subject: [Callers] Another Existential Inquiry
> Message-ID:
> <CAAJTti+363WfJH7Xhv1nHGRVexEZrqE+RNgVNod=
> f5-3v4a4uA(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Given the simplicity of the following, I expect to confirm they already
> exist... but thought I'd check in with the knowledgeable horde here on SW.
>
> This is something I apparently "wrote" over a year ago but found again
> during a files dive today. :) I expect I may have put it aside due to no
> Neighbor swing in the first pass. Spun off w/another A2 to address that
> just now, below.
>
> Revisiting them in light of the great heat we've had locally, they might be
> sweet lower exertion dances with the right tunes. And lack of a second
> swing can be a "feature" vs. "bug" in such conditions.
>
> Please let me know the real author(s), should it not be me. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Don
>
> Don Veino DRAFT 20150117 - Becket Left/CW
>
> A1
> LT Diag R&L Thru
> Ladies Chain Straight Across
> A2
> Star Left
> Star Right
> B1
> Big Oval Left and Right (until opposite P)
> B2
> Gents Allemande Left 1/2x
> Partner Glance Around* Right, Swing
>
> Don Veino DRAFT 20160726 - Becket Left/CW
>
> A1
> LT Diag R&L Thru
> Ladies Chain Straight Across
> A2
> Ladies Glance Around* Right 1x
> Neighbor Swing
> B1
> Big Oval Left and Right (until opposite P)
> B2
> Gents Allemande Left 1/2x
> Partner Glance Around* Right, Swing
>
> *Glance Around is just a placeholder for that other call, you know the
> one...
>
Hi All,
I collected a dance from Lisa Greenleaf. Neither she nor the person
from whom she collected it knows the author. I'm hoping you can help
me. Here it is:
Holiday Daze
Becket
A1 Cir L 3/4, pass through
New neighbor swing
A2 Long lines F&B
Ladies chain
B1 Left diag. hey for 4
B2 (original) Ladies L shoulder gypsy
Partner swing
Thanks
-Amy
I would always include in the notation the fact that the balances for a Box
Circulate are MUCH more satisfying if they are Forward & Back - that sets
you up with the right momentum to cross the set.
I really wish callers would specify the direction of every balance; for
instance if the next move is Allemande Left, then balancing Left/Right is
much better than Right/Left (which leaves you too close to the person you
are Allemanding).
Spinning as you cross the set in a Box Circulate is also fun, and much
easier to do if you have balanced Forward & Back.
:-)
Happy dancing,
John
John Sweeney, Dancer, England john(a)modernjive.com 01233 625 362
http://www.contrafusion.co.uk for Dancing in Kent
Hello all. In addition to the lovely Du Quoin Races dance by Orace Johnson, are you familiar with any other box circulate dances that you could share? Thanks!
Vicki MorrisonTallahassee, FL
For others interested.
On Jul 19, 2016 5:21 PM, "Chris Page" <chriscpage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> "The Merry-Go-Round", by Heiner Fischle, of all people.
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Ron Blechner via Callers
> <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net> wrote:
> > No, but the timing on the circles will confuse some.
> >
> > But if you want 2 long lines, DSD and swing with both partner and
> neighbor,
> > you could do:
> >
> > Duple Imp
> > A1. N DSD (6)
> > NS (10)
> > A2. LLFB (8)
> > Circle L 3/4 (8, forgiving)
> > B1. P DSD (6)
> > PS (10)
> > B2. LLFB (8)
> > Circle L 3/4, Pass Thru By R (6,2)
> >
> > So... has *this* already been written?
> > Similar to Greetings, by Tori Barrone.
> >
> > Ron Blechner
> >
> >
> > On Jul 19, 2016 4:54 PM, "via Callers" <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Not sure if this has already been written, but it fits a particular
> spot in
> > an upcoming program:
> >
> > A1 LL FB
> > Circle L 1.25 to face P on side
> >
> > A2 DSD P, Swing P
> > (or Balance and Swing P)
> >
> > B1 LL FB
> > Circle L .75 to face N on side
> >
> > B2 DSD N, Swing N
> > (or Balance and Swing N)
> >
> > Thanks for any enlightenment!
> >
> > Ann in hot, humid, Annapolis, MD
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Callers mailing list
> > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Callers mailing list
> > Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
> > http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
> >
>
No, but the timing on the circles will confuse some.
But if you want 2 long lines, DSD and swing with both partner and neighbor,
you could do:
Duple Imp
A1. N DSD (6)
NS (10)
A2. LLFB (8)
Circle L 3/4 (8, forgiving)
B1. P DSD (6)
PS (10)
B2. LLFB (8)
Circle L 3/4, Pass Thru By R (6,2)
So... has *this* already been written?
Similar to Greetings, by Tori Barrone.
Ron Blechner
On Jul 19, 2016 4:54 PM, "via Callers" <callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net>
wrote:
Not sure if this has already been written, but it fits a particular spot
in an upcoming program:
A1 LL FB
Circle L 1.25 to face P on side
A2 DSD P, Swing P
(or Balance and Swing P)
B1 LL FB
Circle L .75 to face N on side
B2 DSD N, Swing N
(or Balance and Swing N)
Thanks for any enlightenment!
Ann in hot, humid, Annapolis, MD
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)lists.sharedweight.net
http://lists.sharedweight.net/listinfo.cgi/callers-sharedweight.net
