(Hello folks - I'm a beginning caller, happily lurking here of late...)
Though I haven't tried other styles, I'll second the recommendation for Capezio Dansneakers. I finally just bought my first pair of dance shoes right before going to a weeklong camp - brilliant plan for breaking them in, no? But they felt totally comfortable as soon as I tried them on (granted, my feet are probably pretty "normal"), and I came out of 8 nights in a row of exuberant dancing in them with no problem. Also, I found that they offered enough but not too much traction (I don't like or at least am not used to much slipperiness), and I could also put my weight back on the heel if I chose in order to spin fast. Plus, not that expensive!
And while I'm certainly a comfort-over-fashion sort, I didn't think they were that ugly. ;) Besides, aren't we all gazing into each other's eyes anyway?
Wishing joyful dancing and calling to all,
Susan Pleck
Oakland, CA
----- Original Message ----
From: Tina Fields <tfields8(a)yahoo.com>
To: "callers@ sharedweight.net" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 2:50:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Callers] tic tac shoes
Hi folks -
Like a couple of you who've posted, I too have little
"tortilla feet" - short and wide, women's 6-1/2 D. I do
wear kids' shoes sometimes; that's excellent advice. But
the best shoes I've found for contradancing are Capezio's
Dansneakers. They are ugly to look at, but so comfortable
that I can dance one of those 12-hour events and still go
hiking the next day. I figure my late-night bounciness more
than makes up for the lack of glamour in the shoe
department.
Tina
Tina R. Fields, Ph.D.
(707) 824-9318
"Hindsight Now!"
_______________________________________________
Callers mailing list
Callers(a)sharedweight.net
http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
Hi folks -
Like a couple of you who've posted, I too have little
"tortilla feet" - short and wide, women's 6-1/2 D. I do
wear kids' shoes sometimes; that's excellent advice. But
the best shoes I've found for contradancing are Capezio's
Dansneakers. They are ugly to look at, but so comfortable
that I can dance one of those 12-hour events and still go
hiking the next day. I figure my late-night bounciness more
than makes up for the lack of glamour in the shoe
department.
Tina
Tina R. Fields, Ph.D.
(707) 824-9318
"Hindsight Now!"
Hi Callers,
I need a substitute caller in Exeter, NH for AUGUST 9th. The dance starts at
7:30 p.m. YOU WILL NEED EXPERIENCE TEACHING BEGINNERS. MANY OF THE DANCERS
PRESENT WILL NEVER HAVE DANCED BEFORE. You can expect about 30 dancers to
show up. As we share the gate, you will not make a lot of money. We have a
great house band (Stone Soup), and you are very likely to have a great time.
Let me know if you are available and I will send you directions.
Rickey Holt.
Hi,
I just recently did a dance with 2 Petronella Turns in it, the dance is
below, and realized that I had a question about it. If any of you remember
the dance Petronella, from which the figure was copied, you will remember
that when we moved one place to the right, we moved from the line to the
SPACE between the lines, then to the opposite line, then again to the SPACE
between the lines, then home (when we did it with four people this was still
the amount moved). Describing this from the point of view of one particular
dancer, when we do a Petronella turn today, it seems to me, that dancer
moves what we would have called 2 places to the right to end up in the other
line, then one place up the line, then 2 places to the other line then one
place down the line. From the point of view of the other dancers this is
similar. I assume that this is true of all modern contras that borrow this
Petronella turn. Is this how you see it?
The dance I called was Kitchen Stomp, by Becky Hill
(A1) Neighbor balance and swing / (A2) Men Allemande Left (1 and ½ ),
Partner Swing / (B1) Ladies Chain over, Petronella Balance and Turn / (B2)
Petronella Balance and Turn, Star Left.
Thanks,
Rickey Holt,
Fremont, NH
Rickey, I don't understand the difference as you see it. In the original version
of Petronella, where just the active couple does the turns, yes, those dancers
start on the side, move to the space, then to another side, then to a space, and
back again to their starting place.
When all four dancers became involved-- the version that Dudley dubbed
"Cirtonella" and which became the most common version in New England for several
subsquent decades-- once the active couple had completed the first turn, all
four dancers were in a diamond. Each of the three subsequent turns moves each
dancer one-quarter around the, counterclockwise. Because the actives had started
first and had four such movements, they ended up at home, while the inactives
ended up in the middle space (inactive man above, inactive woman below) and they
needed to move out of the way to their own proper side to allow room for the
actives to proceed down the center.
Today's many dances that incorporate Petronella twirls-- David Smukler lists
more than 100 of what he's dubbed Petronella spinoffs-- tend to start with
dancers in lines. That four person ring is oriented squarely across the set,
rather than on the bias at a 45-degree angle to the lines, but the geometry
holds true. Each dancer moves one-quarter of the way around the ring with each
turn. The difference, such as it is, is in orientation, not in amount of
turning. If you start on a side, you either end up on the side again or across
the set. (e.g., if you were the left-hand dancer in a couple facing across,
after one turn, you'd be where the person on your right had been, and after a
second turn, you'd typically be across from that spot.)
However, the business of moving from a position in a line to another position in
a line also allow the possibility (clever possibility in such dances as Pigtown
Petronella and Maliza's Magical Mystery Motion) of making one turn, then joining
hands in a new foursome to make a second turn.
David Millstone
Lebanon, NH
I need some clarification on the circle dance Levi Jackson Rose...I received the directions in a previous post. Having never called it, I'm tending to take things literally, but the B1 I received sounds like the arms are interior to the circle in the basket....uncomfortably on the women's bellies rather than over the heads and behind backs thus supporting the centrifugal force as in most baskets. Is this a "whole 'nother" type of basket or was something missing in the directions I received below:
B 9-16 16 Ladies go under arch made by partner's L arm, move to the left and come out the next arch, continue left and go under the next arch, 5 ladies join hands in the center while men bring their joined hands over the ladies heads to form the "Rose"
Thanks. I"m in the process of typing all my
danes, and I'm trying to get the author's
original version of each dance, so at least I
know what I'm starting from when I start messing around with a dance....
Jack
At 03:16 AM 7/12/2008, you wrote:
>On 7/10/08, Jack Mitchell <jamitch3(a)mindspring.com> wrote:
> > In Lost in Interstellar Haze, is the Partner Swing in B1 a B&S or just a
> > Swing? If just a swing, it's a really long one.
> >
> > Here's the dance as I have it:
> >
> > A1 RHS 1¼
> > Shadow Alle L (7/8)
> > A2 Straight Across Hey (not with P, Gs lead by R Sh)
> > B1 P Sw / P B&S
> > B2 Ladies Chain
> > LHS 1x
> >
>
>
>The book "Midwest Folklore" puts it as a swing, with a
>printed alternate of "balance and swing."
>
>So it's up to you.
>
>But this is a general principle -- I regularly modify dances,
>sometimes as a general change, and sometimes to help
>the dance fit into the program, like avoiding too many
>circle lefts. Or cut swings shorter because it's hotter. Or...
>
>The catch is to know which is correct for a given situation.
>Luckily, there's often many right answers.
>
>Cheers,
>-Chris Page
>San Diego
>_______________________________________________
>Callers mailing list
>Callers(a)sharedweight.net
>http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
Hi Folks,
A friend of a friend asked for a description of the dance/dance movement
called "Sugar on the Floor." It is not in my repetoire by that name, so i
turn to your collective wisdeom.
Thanks,
Tom
--
Tom Senior
Dance while you can.
Stacy,
Depends what you like - I tend to like flatter shoes with little heel
(the 1/2" heel), other women like more of a heel (say 1 1/4"). Both
sorts can be found in the Square and Round Dance category, quite
contra apropos. I have a whole raft of the Mary Janes because you can
special order them in multiple colors and in WIDE widths!!!! And you
can get the Mary Jane's either as dance shoes, with the leather sole,
or as street shoes with a hard sole, and I have a bunch of those for
non-dance as well. On the other hand, if you want a Ginger Rogers-
esque shoe for that New Year's Eve contra, you can check out the
ballroom group, or get funky with the mint-colored or two-tone Lindy
Hop series, or go country with boots. Oh, and did I say that they are
comfortable? It's a smorgasbord of terpsichorean delight. And a
variety of nice and comfy shoes for men, too.
Martha
On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:00 AM, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net wrote:
> Send Callers mailing list submissions to
> callers(a)sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Callers Digest, Vol 46, Issue 12 (Stacy Rose)
> 2. Re: Any Whipperstompers out there? (Jack Mitchell)
> 3. Re: Any Whipperstompers out there? (Chris Page)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 13:40:50 -0700
> From: "Stacy Rose" <stacyrose12(a)verizon.net>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Callers Digest, Vol 46, Issue 12
> To: "'Caller's discussion list'" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Message-ID: <0K3G00B4N6FSR0XE(a)vms173005.mailsrvcs.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Martha - this looks like a great resource. Of the different styles,
> which
> are conducive for contra dancing?
>
> Thanks,
> Stacy Rose
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: callers-bounces(a)sharedweight.net [mailto:callers-
>> bounces(a)sharedweight.net] On Behalf Of Martha Wild
>> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 10:28 PM
>> To: callers(a)sharedweight.net
>> Subject: Re: [Callers] Callers Digest, Vol 46, Issue 12
>>
>> I recommend TicTacToes - check out all the dancing shoes they have
>> available at TicTacToes.com - I've bought quite a few pair from them,
>> and they are comfortable and have great suede/leather soles and all
>> sorts of styles and colors and widths. They have shoes for men and
>> women - they have them for all kinds of dancing, from ballroom to tap
>> to country Western. I can't dance in tennis shoes because since they
>> don't slip well I end up tweaking my right knee when doing buzz step
>> swings. And the prices are about usual for shoes.
>> Martha
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2008, at 9:00 AM, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net wrote:
>>
>>> Send Callers mailing list submissions to
>>> callers(a)sharedweight.net
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>> callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>> callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>> 1. Shoes (Rickey)
>>> 2. Re: Shoes (Mortland, Jo)
>>> 3. Re: Shoes (Laur)
>>>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> --
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:01:58 -0400
>>> From: "Rickey" <holt.e(a)comcast.net>
>>> Subject: [Callers] Shoes
>>> To: <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
>>> Message-ID: <000901c8d635$28ac7260$020fa8c0@maxx>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am considering buying my first pair of shoes bought expressly for
>>> contra
>>> dancing. What do you recommend? What do you think of suede
>>> soles? I need
>>> good arch support. Whatever I buy would also need to be acceptable
>>> to dance
>>> organizers in need of protecting their venue's floors.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Rickey Holt.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 15:10:20 -0500
>>> From: "Mortland, Jo" <j-mortland(a)neiu.edu>
>>> Subject: Re: [Callers] Shoes
>>> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
>>> Message-ID:
>>> <9B0B0B8FF2328E48930D4B6273C1B2610CBD1CFE(a)EXNODE1.univ.neiu.edu>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I need to wear orthotics in my every day shoes for arch support.
>>>
>>> So when I buy new shoes, I take the old pair, one that accommodates
>>> the
>>> orthotics, to a shoe clinic. I ask for "dance leather" (suede)
>>> to be
>>> affixed to the bottoms of the shoes, but only from the toe to the
>>> arch
>>> (not the heel). This way I have support and a great surface for
>>> swinging. Costs me about $30.00. and I keep updating my dance
>>> shoes as
>>> I purchase new regular wear ones. (I wear SAS shoes. I used to
>>> have a
>>> pair of Rockports with which I did the same thing.)
>>>
>>> Jo Mortland
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 17:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
>>> From: Laur <lcpgr(a)yahoo.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Callers] Shoes
>>> To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
>>> Message-ID: <173165.55101.qm(a)web52907.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>
>>>
>>> I sent an earlier message off list -
>>>
>>> Same goes for me.
>>>
>>> In my case I buy a good supportive tennis shoe, but I have swede
>>> put on the bottom of the whole shoe. It just works for me. And it
>>> also costs about 30-40 depending on who you go to.
>>>
>>> I have in the past put leather on a vinyl bottomed shoe.
>>>
>>> Of course, if you have a pair of shoes that work for you - old
>>> sneakers, just put duct tape on them. I did that for nine years.
>>> It worked just fine.
>>>
>>> Laurie
>>> GR
>>>
>>> --- On Tue, 6/24/08, Mortland, Jo <j-mortland(a)neiu.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: Mortland, Jo <j-mortland(a)neiu.edu>
>>>> Subject: Re: [Callers] Shoes
>>>> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
>>>> Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2008, 4:10 PM
>>>> I need to wear orthotics in my every day shoes for arch
>>>> support.
>>>>
>>>> So when I buy new shoes, I take the old pair, one that
>>>> accommodates the
>>>> orthotics, to a shoe clinic. I ask for "dance
>>>> leather" (suede) to be
>>>> affixed to the bottoms of the shoes, but only from the toe
>>>> to the arch
>>>> (not the heel). This way I have support and a great
>>>> surface for
>>>> swinging. Costs me about $30.00. and I keep updating my
>>>> dance shoes as
>>>> I purchase new regular wear ones. (I wear SAS shoes. I
>>>> used to have a
>>>> pair of Rockports with which I did the same thing.)
>>>>
>>>> Jo Mortland
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Callers mailing list
>>>> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
>>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Callers mailing list
>>> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
>>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>>>
>>>
>>> End of Callers Digest, Vol 46, Issue 12
>>> ***************************************
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Callers mailing list
>> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:38:07 -0400
> From: Jack Mitchell <jamitch3(a)mindspring.com>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Any Whipperstompers out there?
> To: Caller's discussion list <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Message-ID: <E1KEYNA-0000jp-Rl(a)elasmtp-kukur.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
> There's a great video online from the weekend at
> http://whipperstompers.org/ That and Adina's description of the
> weekend makes me wish that I had been able to make it (though I'm not
> sure I would have survived the heat....) Definitely interested in
> going next year though if they have it again. From a callers
> perspective it sounds like just what I would have hoped it would be
> and none of what I had worried it might be.
>
> That being said, the dance that Charlotte is calling in the video
> looked like a good one, and is one that I don't have. Anyone
> recognize it? What I got from the video is:
>
> Becket
>
> A1 P Gypsy and Sw
> A2 L Chain
> LHS 1x
> B1 New N B&S
> B2 Gents chain
> 1/2 Hey (gents start by left shoulder)
>
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jack
> At 02:20 AM 7/3/2008, you wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Sorry it took me a week to respond about the
>> Whipperstomper. Lindsay, thanks! I'm so glad you enjoyed it that
>> much! It was great to see you there.
>>
>> I went into the weekend with some reservations. Who would
>> come? What would the general attitude be? Would there be trouble
>> with 100 teens and 20-somethings in a state park for the
>> weekend? Were people open to learning? Would groups mix? Was it
>> going to be pro-youth, or anti-age?
>>
>> Short answers: Everybody. Positive. Almost
>> none. Yes! Yes. Pro-youth. I'm so impressed by what happened
>> there I almost can't describe it.
>>
>> The general attitude of the weekend, coming from the organizers and
>> effectively transmitted to the dancers, was that young dancers can
>> be a positive force in their communities. We talked about and
>> worked on style, dance-floor safety, encouraging and helping each
>> other, calling, playing for dances, and community
>> involvement. There was more intentional learning and discussion
>> than at other weekends I've been at -- the purpose wasn't only to
>> dance and have fun, but to build community, both with other young
>> dancers and with the wider community.
>>
>> Dancers came from all over -- the majority from North and South
>> Carolina, but also from Virginia, Maryland, New York, Massachusetts,
>> Vermont, Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, and I think a couple other
>> states. New England was well-represented. As Lindsay mentioned,
>> especially on Friday night folks danced mainly with people they
>> already knew, but by Sunday it was a typical dance weekend
>> love-fest. I was looking at the leaders of tomorrow's dance
>> community meeting each other, making connections, and becoming
>> friends, and I left feeling really good about the future of
>> Anglo-American folk dance.
>>
>> Lindsay mentioned both the heat & lack of fans, and the passion he
>> saw. Those are interrelated.
>>
>> There were supposed to be huge box fans for the dance hall, borrowed
>> from the Old Farmers Ball in Asheville, NC. Unfortunately, 2 weeks
>> before the Whipperstomper the ceiling collapsed in Bryson Hall at
>> Warren Wilson College, where the OFB weekly dance is held and the
>> fans are stored. (http://www.oldfarmersball.com/bryson_update.htm
>> for more information.) Truly miraculously, no-one was injured in
>> what could have been a devastating catastrophe; school had ended a
>> week earlier and the collapse happened a few hours before a
>> dance. Bryson was quarantined, so there was no way to get the fans
>> out. Hence the passion Linsay mentioned: In the sweltering
>> heat -- it was an uncooled hall in 90-some degree weather, without
>> fans -- there were no complaints or early check-outs, and the
>> dancers danced nonstop for hours.
>>
>> And -- holy cow! What dancing! I've never seen such great dancing
>> in one place, and I say that as a dance gypsy and itinerant dance
>> caller. I've never called to a better group, anywhere. These kids
>> can DANCE! (--and do it safely, and on time!)
>>
>> Watching the organizers through the process, from last fall til now,
>> was exciting. They did a great job, really matured in the process,
>> and became even better leaders. They came to see that their
>> responsibility within the dance community doesn't end with age x;
>> we're all in this together. I'm enormously proud of them! Keep in
>> mind that the main organizer, who drove the entire process, turned
>> 21 that weekend. He showed incredible initiative and drive to make
>> it happen, learned much more than he had anticipated in the process,
>> and did a better job than most people probably would have
>> expected. For the future of the entire dance community, that
>> experience was priceless.
>>
>> Having Ethan Hazzard-Watkins, the CDSS Youth Projects Intern, at the
>> weekend was a real boon. Some of the young dancers hadn't heard of
>> CDSS, and Ethan added a lot in outreach, information, and helping
>> make connections. Hopefully it will translate both to more CDSS
>> memberships and more participation in CDSS programs in the future.
>>
>> I call the Whipperstomper was a huge success, in numerous ways. It
>> was terrific fun, a new generation got immersed in organizing, the
>> future leaders of our community made connections they'll have for
>> the rest of their lives, and quite a few of those southern dancers
>> will be making the trip to Vermont for the Youth Dance Weekend in
>> September. We started something good, and round 2 is sure to be
>> even better!
>>
>> Please note that though the Youth Dance Weekend Sept. 12-14
>> (http://youthdanceweekend.org/) is targeted at dancers under 35, it
>> is not age-restricted. Those over 35 are welcome to attend, with
>> higher pricing. The goal is to encourage younger dancers, and as
>> younger people often have lower (or no) earnings, one suggestion is
>> that older and more financially stable dancers consider paying the
>> admission of a younger dancer. If you're over 35 and still want to
>> attend the weekend there are options available for you.
>>
>> Lindsay also mentioned the wonderful facilities at Table Rock State
>> Park, in South Carolina. Harvest Moon's annual dance weekend,
>> Moondance, is also held there, Sept 5-7 2008. A wonderful
>> weekend! http://www.harvestmoonfolk.org/moondanc.htm for more
>> information. Space is still available.
>>
>> Thanks for asking about the weekend, Chris. I should add one more
>> thing -- I'm reporting this from the perspective of one of 8 or 10
>> people there over the age of 35, not one of the under-35
>> in-crowd. It was a real honor to call there.
>>
>> - Adina
>> ---------
>> Adina Gordon
>> http://www.adinagordon.com/
>>
>>
>> --- On Fri, 6/27/08, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
>> <callers-request(a)sharedweight.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:08:56 -0400
>>> From: "Chris Weiler (home)"
>>> <chris.weiler(a)weirdtable.org>
>>> Subject: [Callers] Any Whipperstompers out there?
>>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> Anybody attend the Whipperstompers weekend a couple
>>> of weeks ago in South Carolina? I talked with Adina
>>> Gordon last night about it and she had some good things
>>> to say. Adina, that's your cue to let us know how it went
>>> and your impressions about what the organizers and
>>> attendees took away from it. ;)
>>>
>>> Anyone else attend and want to share their experiences?
>>>
>>> Adina and I found out that we're both planning on
>>> attending the Youth Dance Weekend in Vermont in
>>> September. Anyone else going to be there?
>>>
>>> Happy Dancing,
>>> Chris Weiler
>>> Goffstown, NH
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 10:28:46 -0400
>>> From: Lindsay Morris <lindsay(a)TSMworks.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Callers] Any Whipperstompers out there?
>>>
>>> Whipperstompers was great!
>>>
>>> Adina was great - dance games were esp cool! - the band was
>>> excellent, and the people were very fun.
>>> A lot of Brasstown kids hung together; a couple of people
>>> felt a little excluded by them, but when you've got all
>>> that history, yeah, it's hard not to bond even more....
>>>
>>> Hot - some big box fans would have been great...
>>>
>>> I wish I had camped - beautiful campsites close together.
>>> Table Rock is a great facility.
>>>
>>> <rant>
>>> Groups that meet for primarily social reasons die (or might
>>> as well). Groups that share a passion for something grow.
>>> </rant>
>>>
>>> When I sat out and just watched the dancers at
>>> Whipperstompers, wow! Lots of passion there. Big
>>> buckets of gotta-dance just overflowing.
>>>
>>> Our contra-dance language continues to morph and grow,
>>> beautifully. Lots of contact-improv and swing creeping in.
>>> Outright theatrics, ending just in time to meet the next...
>>>
>>> Many of these kids youngsters dancers grew up sleeping on
>>> the corner of the stage, reels seeping into their
>>> motion-fibers from age 1. So it's no wonder they move
>>> at such a high level. Beautiful to watch.
>>>
>>> We ARE part of a golden age, as someone said recently.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Callers mailing list
>> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
>> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 18:31:42 -0700
> From: "Chris Page" <chriscpage(a)gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] Any Whipperstompers out there?
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Message-ID:
> <9469896c0807031831l50f79d9bp25ae134c7afac634(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 7/3/08, Jack Mitchell <jamitch3(a)mindspring.com> wrote:
>> That being said, the dance that Charlotte is calling in the video
>> looked
>> like a good one, and is one that I don't have. Anyone recognize it?
>
> The Broken Mirror by Bill Olson.
>
> http://full.pamweeks.com/mirror.html
>
>
> -Chris Page
> San Diego
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
>
> End of Callers Digest, Vol 47, Issue 2
> **************************************
