Karen, I knew from meeting you last spring at NEFFA that you were a very nice
person. Now, after learning how you deal with this dancer, I'm sure that you're
a saint! With sensitivity and maturity, you are able to change your methods at the events that are her home dances.
I assume (perhaps incorrectly) that this dancer just wants attention, and so I might get frustrated, and then confrontational, if I had to deal with her issues. Your way is the better way: to just change mikes and move on to bringing joy to all the dancers. ... Bob
--
Robert Jon Golder
164 Maxfield St
New Bedford, MA 02740
(508) 999-2486
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Karen Fontana <karen_fontana(a)yahoo.com>
> Hi Bob,
>
> In a county where I manage one dance and also call in neighboring
communities
> (three other dances), we have one dancer who has made it known (very loudly)
> that she gets headaches if wireless technology is used. She gives out all
sorts
> of handouts and research findings on the topic.
>
> Heres how Ive dealt with it .. As a caller, if Im calling in any of the
> four dances in her community, I figure these are her home area dances. I ask
> the sound guy to set up both my wireless mic AND one corded mic and so were
> ready to go with either. If she shows up, I use the corded mic. She usually
> comes up and asks the caller and sound person what were using. At first, I
> kind of struggled with this, as my preference is to use my own wireless mic
(not
> only for the convenience of wireless but for the convenience of keeping my
germs
> to myself on my own mic). But after thinking it over, I mainly think about
> these local dances being closest to her home. So, I adapt my teaching a bit
and
> deal with it. At the dance I manage, that one is the closest of the four to
her
> home. So, we (the sound engineer) use a corded mic.
>
> I suppose this could lead to an entire discussion in itself ..
>
> As for myself, I live in Mountain View, California, and our entire city now
> has free wireless for notebook pcs, due to Googles donation to the city
> (Googles corporate headquarters are in Mountain View).
>
> If anyone is interested in any of these articles or research, Im sure shed
> be more than happy to share some of it, and I can put you in contact with her
> directly, or I can share it broadly.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Karen Fontana
>
>
> robertgolder(a)comcast.net wrote: -------------- Original message
> ----------------------
> From: Karen Fontana
> > ....I couldn't get down to the floor quick enough (wasn't using my wireless
> mic
> > due to one dancer's sensitivity to wireless equipment)....
>
> Curiosity has gotten the best of me.... what was the dancer's problem with or
> objection to a wireless mike? .... Bob
> --
> Robert Jon Golder
> 164 Maxfield St
> New Bedford, MA 02740
> (508) 999-2486
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
>
>
> <>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>
>
>
> Karen Fontana
> www.karenscontracorner.com
> karen_fontana(a)yahoo.com
> (H) 650-691-9663
>
> <>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>:<>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
There seems to be resources regarding "electrosmog" and "electric pollution" along with a long list of symptoms at http://www.lifeenergies.com/index.htm
The resources that I glanced at cited studies of electomagnetic energy more in the microwave range and cellphone transmitter range, which is much higher than wireless mic range.
I would imagine that the energy issued from a wireless mic would pale in comparision to the energy emitted from the 50 cellphones in the dance hall.
It would be interesting if this sensitive person could detect when the wireless was on.
TEST: 5 batteries: one charged, others dead, each with hidden labels (A-E). Wireless mic with all displays and indicators concealed. One by one, put a battery in mic for 20 minutes and record all reported symptoms. See if there is a corelation.
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Karen Fontana <karen_fontana(a)yahoo.com>
> ....I couldn't get down to the floor quick enough (wasn't using my wireless mic
> due to one dancer's sensitivity to wireless equipment)....
Curiosity has gotten the best of me.... what was the dancer's problem with or objection to a wireless mike? .... Bob
--
Robert Jon Golder
164 Maxfield St
New Bedford, MA 02740
(508) 999-2486
Ah, the impacts of technology. I was recently calling for a contradance at
the Maine Social Forum. It was a crowd of primarily beginners, with only a
smattering of experienced folks. During one of the dances, one young man got
a cell phone call. He stepped out of line to take the call! His partner
carried on for a moment or two, but then the line started to break down. I
had to jump into the line and grab his partner - calling while we danced -
to keep it going. It worked. Fortunately I'd had a little practice on this
at another dance earlier this summer when an elderly gentleman simply
decided to step out and sit down during a - thankfully - very simple dance -
and I had done the same thing rather than stop or let the line crumble.
Just wanted to "share"
:-)
-cynthia
Note first that I am not an experienced caller and my comments are only
based on my experience as a contra dancer.
I love to both provide and hear the foot percussion. I also think it adds to
the enjoyment of the other dancers and, possibly, the energy level of the
band and hall. Also, with size 14's, I'm always worried about stepping on
those bare feet!
I can't imagine a barefooter feeling comfortable being told during a dance
that they should wear shoes. Some signage at entryways recommending shoes
for safety might not be bad. Another idea that might help is to discuss the
positive effects of wearing shoes and providing foot percussion during the
dance. Maybe the barefooters would want to join in with the music and wear
shoes so they could.
Darrell
On 9/4/06, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net <
callers-request(a)sharedweight.net> wrote:
>
> Send Callers mailing list submissions to
> callers(a)sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: A funny incident (Barbara Groh)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:46:20 -0400
> From: "Barbara Groh" <barbaragroh(a)bellsouth.net>
> Subject: Re: [Callers] A funny incident
> To: "Caller's discussion list" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Message-ID: <005b01c6cfc3$ebf08a60$6400a8c0@Babs>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
> I appreciate your sharing, Cynthia---this gave me a good laugh. With many
> dances attracting a large percentage of high school and college kids these
> days, I see more and more youthful antics while I'm calling....the young
> men
> holding onto their oversized baggy pants with one hand while they dance;
> the
> "Grateful Dead" dance moves or the breakdance or hiphop moves thrown in;
> and
> the leaping, hopping, cartwheeling, and rolling around on the floor at the
> break (or perhaps during the walkthroughs and the dances as well).
>
> One thing I noticed while calling in Charleston, SC, recently (where 90%
> of
> the crowd was under 21) was that most of the dancers were barefoot. This
> seems to be the trend for younger dancers. I think their timing would
> improve if they wore shoes, because they'd be able to hear the rhythm
> better. There was very little foot percussion at that dance. (personally,
> I
> think it's also aesthetically more pleasing to hear the feet, but I'm old
> school) It's also a safety issue when there are shoed and shoeless people
> dancing in the same room.
> But I was wondering what, if anything, I should say about it. I didn't
> want
> to come across as bossy, preachy, old-fashioned, or whatever. Any ideas
> on
> this?
> ~Barbara
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cynthia Phinney" <cynth(a)gwi.net>
> To: "Callers Shared Weight" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 12:07 PM
> Subject: [Callers] A funny incident
>
>
> > Ah, the impacts of technology. I was recently calling for a contradance
> at
> > the Maine Social Forum. It was a crowd of primarily beginners, with only
> a
> > smattering of experienced folks. During one of the dances, one young man
> > got
> > a cell phone call. He stepped out of line to take the call! His partner
> > carried on for a moment or two, but then the line started to break down.
> I
> > had to jump into the line and grab his partner - calling while we danced
> -
> > to keep it going. It worked. Fortunately I'd had a little practice on
> this
> > at another dance earlier this summer when an elderly gentleman simply
> > decided to step out and sit down during a - thankfully - very simple
> > dance -
> > and I had done the same thing rather than stop or let the line crumble.
> >
> > Just wanted to "share"
> > :-)
> >
> > -cynthia
> > _______________________________________________
> > Callers mailing list
> > Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> > http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
>
> End of Callers Digest, Vol 25, Issue 3
> **************************************
>
Dear Barbara,
I, too, am a bit concerned about bare feet at dances, and am very glad that no one has been hurt, at least at the dances that I have attended or called! But I must also admit that I don't feel firmly enough about the issue to have done much about it....prefering instead to think about this as "freedom of choice for the individual", etc., etc.
One suggestion that I do have for this particular problem comes from the Public Health realm....you might want to check with the local Board of Health. There may be regulations that prohibit bare feet in public venues (such as restaurants, etc.), in an attempt to reduce the risks of transmission of fungus, etc. In this way, the dance organizers/callers can avoid the whole issue of right/wrong, good taste/bad taste discussions, and instead promote the need to be in compliance with the local regs.
Another thought on the issue: Although I have no idea how insurance companies might interpret "no shoes" as putting a dance organizer at risk, one could argue that the wearing of shoes does help reduce the risk of injury. So once again, if a dance committee decides to institute a "no bare feet" rule, reducing liability risk is a defensible reason for instituting such a rule.
Looking forward to the thoughts of others! Linda Leslie
Hi Barbara,
I think bare-footing is a generational thing. When I first started dancing 20+ years ago (back in the hippy days)
all my friends were dancing barefoot, as was I. Now with
foot problems showing up, sensible dance shoes are my choice. These lessons we learn in the course of time!
( I still dance shoeless on hot summer nights)
another aside: the best rhythm makers are shoes with hard leather bottoms and they are becoming hard to find.
(at least in my area) :-)
Thanks Gale
Cynthia,
I've had people drop out, or sometimes just confused as to which minor
set they were in, leaving a lump of people not knowing whom to
interact with. Sometimes I've been able to physically go to the group
and take their hands and say "let's just pop down to the bottom (or
top) of the set and jump in from there." Unfortunately, if the dance
has "out of minor set" interaction, such as a shadow, this fix may not
be available.
That's where the humor comes in: how do I, as the caller, own the
confusion and make it OK to be a dancer who got confused.
So, anyone heard any good "attention shifting" humor lately? Or a
non-humorous response that still makes it OK.
--Jerome Grisanti
On 9/1/06, callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
<callers-request(a)sharedweight.net> wrote:
> Send Callers mailing list submissions to
> callers(a)sharedweight.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> callers-request(a)sharedweight.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> callers-owner(a)sharedweight.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Callers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. A funny incident (Cynthia Phinney)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 12:07:43 -0400
> From: "Cynthia Phinney" <cynth(a)gwi.net>
> Subject: [Callers] A funny incident
> To: "Callers Shared Weight" <callers(a)sharedweight.net>
> Message-ID: <GCEOLNPEKAIPGAOIBCPFEEKCDHAA.cynth(a)gwi.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Ah, the impacts of technology. I was recently calling for a contradance at
> the Maine Social Forum. It was a crowd of primarily beginners, with only a
> smattering of experienced folks. During one of the dances, one young man got
> a cell phone call. He stepped out of line to take the call! His partner
> carried on for a moment or two, but then the line started to break down. I
> had to jump into the line and grab his partner - calling while we danced -
> to keep it going. It worked. Fortunately I'd had a little practice on this
> at another dance earlier this summer when an elderly gentleman simply
> decided to step out and sit down during a - thankfully - very simple dance -
> and I had done the same thing rather than stop or let the line crumble.
>
> Just wanted to "share"
> :-)
>
> -cynthia
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Callers mailing list
> Callers(a)sharedweight.net
> http://www.sharedweight.net/mailman/listinfo/callers
>
>
> End of Callers Digest, Vol 25, Issue 1
> **************************************
>
--
Jerome Grisanti
660-528-0714
502-876-4280
Hello everyone,
I apologize for the outage. In case you hadn't noticed, the server that
hosts SharedWeight had a power supply failure yesterday afternoon. I
scrambled to put a replacement together, and I'm nearly there.
Mail should now be working again, but the websites won't be back up until
tonight at the earliest.
Any mail sent over the past 24 hours will probably be automatically resent
by your mail server. If you did get a bounce, simply resend it. (If it
continues to error, it may take another hour or two for the DNS change to
fully propagate.)
-Seth
Hi all
I have a version of Steamboat Quickstep that seems to be a variant of the
version in CDM 1 (#7). My version is proper.
(A1) Down the center 4 in line (elbows linked), and backwards back to
place
(A2) Down the center 2-by-2 (1s lead)
1s only turn alone (this is the progression)
All back
(B1) Star Right once around
Star Left back (stars are hands across)
(B2) All Swing Partner
My question is: It seems awkward to end the swing, everybody proper, lady on
the right, and facing down the hall.
The version in CDM has the same problem.
Thanks for your help,
Rickey Holt.
